{"id":131,"date":"2006-04-27T07:05:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-27T11:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/?p=131"},"modified":"2022-01-02T07:39:49","modified_gmt":"2022-01-02T12:39:49","slug":"a-cambridge-copycat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/?p=131","title":{"rendered":"A Cambridge Copycat?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/wp-content\/blogger\/cheating_on_test.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"277\" height=\"180\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/wp-content\/blogger\/cheating_on_test.gif\" \/><\/a>If <a href=\"http:\/\/ocularfusion.blogspot.com\/2006\/04\/great-american-blog.html\">my last post<\/a> wasn&#8217;t fully convincing, let me offer up another good reason why publishing the Great American Novel might not be all it&#8217;s cracked up to be.<\/p>\n<p>Kaavya Viswanathan.<\/p>\n<p>Kaavya is a 19-year-old sophomore at Harvard and author of the latest entry into the skyrocketing literary genre know as &#8220;chic-lit.&#8221; Her book, entitled &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0316059889\/sr=8-1\/qid=1146138797\/ref=pd_bbs_1\/103-7318197-7024641?%5Fencoding=UTF8\">How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life<\/a>,&#8221; focuses on a high school senior named Opal Mehta and her frantic attempts to get accepted into the school of her dreams and destiny&#8211;Harvard, naturally. It <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/06\/books\/06opal.html?ex=1146283200&#038;en=f497c872f6bf601e&#038;ei=5070\">was properly feted in the New York Times <\/a>when it debuted earlier this month, and all seemed well for the Harvard coed who was celebrating a six figure, two book deal and a DreamWorks movie contract.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Since that time, however, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecrimson.com\/article.aspx?ref=512948\">allegations by the Harvard Crimson that Ms. Viswanathan &#8220;borrowed&#8221; key ideas and phrases<\/a> from two other previously published books, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0609807919\/qid=1146138836\/sr=2-1\/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1\/103-7318197-7024641?s=books&#038;v=glance&#038;n=283155\">&#8220;Second Helpings&#8221;<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0609807900\/ref=pd_bxgy_text_b\/103-7318197-7024641?%5Fencoding=UTF8\">&#8220;Sloppy Firsts&#8221;<\/a> by Megan McCafferty, have shown up and crashed the party. Although she at first dodged the question, Ms. Viswanathan has since acknowledged that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/25\/books\/25book.html?n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fH%2fHarvard%20University%20\">she inadvertantly &#8220;internalized&#8221;<\/a> passages from the the books in question and used them in her latest work. She has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/news\/2006\/04\/26\/D8H7NBR83.html\">issued an apology<\/a> to Ms. McCafferty and her publisher, but apparently the apology was not accepted. Some of the disputed passages can be seen<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecrimson.com\/article.aspx?ref=512965\"> here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It does not appear at first glance that Ms. Viswanathan&#8217;s alleged indiscretions are of the same magnitude as <a href=\"http:\/\/ocularfusion.blogspot.com\/2006\/01\/you-dont-mess-around-with-oprah.html\">James Frey&#8217;s.<\/a> She did, after all, produce a more or less original story and properly marketed her work as fiction rather than passing it off as a memoir.<\/p>\n<p>However, this latest literary brouhaha does bring to light how difficult it may be to craft a truely &#8220;original&#8221; story and how easy it has become, given the rapid expansion of information via the internet and almighty Google, to spot potential plagiarism.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m wondering how many pleasing phrases I may have &#8220;inadvertantly&#8221; lifted from other sources over the years and used in my own writings. I&#8217;m also curious as to what you think about Ms. Viswanathan&#8217;s explanation. Is it possible to &#8220;internalize&#8221; and unwittingly use that many seemingly parallel passages, or is it more likely that Ms. Viswanathan is a &#8220;Cambridge Copycat&#8221; and had the works in question sitting in front of her as she wrote her own book?<\/p>\n<p>Oh well, like I said, it all seems like another cautionary tale writ large across the American cultural landscape. The moral of the story? Stick to the blog&#8211;nobody ever reads it anyway.<\/p>\n<p>Tomorrow: The much anticipated (heh) Part III of my series, &#8220;Blogging&#8211;The Wonder Years.&#8221; You don&#8217;t want to get miss it and get &#8220;caught short.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>Update 4\/28\/06<\/p>\n<p>Little, Brown and Company, the publisher of Ms. Viswanathan&#8217;s book, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.breitbart.com\/news\/2006\/04\/27\/D8H8LUJ00.html\">has pulled the disputed novel<\/a> from store shelves and retailers until the plagiarized passages can be excised and revised. Megan McCafferty states that she is &#8220;not seeking restitution in any form&#8221; and hopes that both she and Ms. Viswanathan can put the incident behind them and move on in their careers.<\/p>\n<p>Not a bad resolution&#8211;no nasty lawsuit, Ms. McCafferty&#8217;s work and name remain intact (and her compassion to a young emerging writer will not doubt help her reputation), and Ms. Viswanathan learns the kind of lesson that they don&#8217;t teach at Harvard these days. Doris Kearns Goodwin seems to have recovered quite nicely, so chances are she will too.<\/p>\n<p>Coming soon, the memoir: &#8220;How Kaavya Viswanathan Got Caught, Got Wise and Got a Lesson.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If my last post wasn&#8217;t fully convincing, let me offer up another good reason why publishing the Great American Novel might not be all it&#8217;s cracked up to be. Kaavya Viswanathan. Kaavya is a 19-year-old sophomore&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25,24,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-culture","category-current-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=131"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9707,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131\/revisions\/9707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ocularfusion.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}